JUDGE HULLIN’S SECOND PRELIMINARY INQUIRY

This second preliminary inquiry which concluded with “no grounds for proceeding”, was the umpteenth confirmation of the judicial fury and insolence of this judge who continued his illegal plans with omissions and forgeries.

Not satisfied with his abuses, he also involved  the family through laughable indictments in view of the facts and documental evidence. But it was a common habit  for the three proceedings to base oneself on indictments supported by lies , manipulations, mistakes and clear omissions. And furthermore in this way all law code rules had been disobeyed.

This second judicial farce had been well planned as further help to the bankruptcy farce.

To all indictments of fraud and defalcation he added simple and fraudulent bankruptcy for the office as if it had been a commercial and/or industrial activity ! But more curious were the declarations he created with eloquence really worthy of a theatrical play.

Reading the points in the “no grounds for proceeding”, it’s possible to retrace his accusatory castle stages based only on “inferences and interpretations”. He disobeyed all documental truth. In the description of the facts many contradictions emerge in a hilarious way. The most emblematic example was to declare that the clients could not be reimbursed, as he personally had frozen the accounts ! The most ridiculous was a presumed declaration to have found only e few documents which matched the clients' dossiers. A gross lie and false !

Talking about linear metres, in the office there were 15 cupboards (1m x 2m with 3 levels) it means there were 45 linear metres used to contain documents.

In fact to remove these documents, which had been thrown mixed into boxes, they used a removal truck.

Such statement had been completely disproved in March 2004 when I had control of the situation and on the basis of documental proof in my possession , they couldn’t lie anymore.

In fact, in front of Hullin’s paranoiac manifestation, that clients had been robbed of their possessions, the liquidator paid every last euros-cent; the same happened for suppliers, social corporations, salaries and so on. So the haughty fraud and defalcation became ridiculous.

Not being satisfied to have transgressed in Monaco , on the basis of false declarations of a bad faith client, he prepared an International Rogatory in Switzerland , in Lugano, on 13 December 2002. This was his second forgery , obviously supported by Institutions.

His plan of transgression was very clear : to freeze all assets by every means, being perfectly aware of creating  false facts; from the first Rogatory on , there has been a long series.

Only after the “great cleanup ”by Authorities in Monaco, proceedings took another turn according to justice.

Even if the concluding time was postponed , in fact  8 August 2006 verdict had been concluded as “ not bankruptcy”, after more than one year, such verdict was closed as “no grounds for proceeding”; it was the victory for TRUTH , the story which began on 10 December 2001 was going to conclude definitely on 29 August 2007.

A note of worthiness must be made for  Swiss justice and Lawyer Rocco Olgiati.

After the interrogation on 19 July 2007 at the Public Attorney in Lugano and following the  various exhaustively obtained declarations, the lawyer Rocco Olgiati asked for the official closing obtained on 29 August 2007. He received it on 4 October , the preliminary inquiry had been concluded by him only in 7 days as “ no grounds for proceeding” as there were no criminal elements.

So it was possible to define the last chapter of Hullin’s Swiss saga which had begun on 2001.