UPDATINGS
A preface :
The documents and events which follow, have been found and emerged after a further two years from the conclusion of the suffered judicial farce. The legitimate suspicion consolidated that it was a planned and hatched plot to have a culprit.
RESEARCH OF BANK ACCOUNTS IN MONACO
Strangely only the Credit Foncier de Monaco replied to Tiberti’s research. There was no trace of the other two bank accounts in Monaco under the code name “ITACA” and “BASCIANO”. Was it a deliberate omission by excellent banks or a veto to prevent anyone knowing?
SOMETHING JURIDICALLY UNCLEAR, ACCESSES TO FRAUD
If fraud has been committed against Banca di Roma and the funds have gone to DAISY Ltd account, they should have been held by Magistracy and given to the injured party. But in this case they are at the disposition of the “Liquidator” for the supposed guilty party, but maybe something eludes me?
In fact Pedretti has given them back. But where are those funds which were on Testa and Mangione’s bank accounts at the Credit Foncier de Monaco? And the other two banks?
BANCA DI ROMA ‘s CHARITY
So the Banca di Roma has lost $ 2,710,000.00 for the suffered fraud by Testa and by the others, and it paid $ 2,900,000.00 for transaction with the heirs, the Government of Congo and the lawyers. According to the facts it has got back only $ 50,000.00 from Pedretti ; something strange happened between the two banks, who knows what ?
in the following years
Watering-can watered ( as they say in Italian, but the real sense is another one ….. in the meaning of corruption ).
Judge Hullin , witness summoned by Jean-Christophe Moroni, must justify at least one of his actions . In October 2004, even if the dossier was closed and he was not responsible for it anymore, gave dispositions to unfreeze an account in Lichtenstein, on which Moroni held 400,000 Dollars, trying to get the sum back. But what kind of authorization did he have to take such action? “ No authorization, it was out of proceeding” a little bit inconvenient…., his way of being judge through falsehood -.
On page 10 about the trial postponement, Hullin depicted the figure of Catone who was implicated in a judicial inquiry and , as always, the innocence presumption didn’t exist.
As the matter regarding ABATEC is concluded and as the Chieti Court has concluded with “ discharge as the matter doesn’t exist “ , it’s possible to see the link :