Chapter V - Appeal

It was clear that such first instance "play", had been acted like a theatrical piece, even with sarcastic words such as : when faced with D. Auter’s request for 5 years, Court decided for only 4 ! Or "the matter could have a worsted conclusion for recycling" and for this imputation I was acquitted through a declaration to "dismiss the case". It was sure that, although faced with lawyer Bertozzi’s conclusion, who showed  " documental proof ", the Court didn’t take the situation into any consideration and gave no answers, keeping Hullin and Tiberti’s declarations, supporting everything unashamedly. At this point there was a doubt about the documentation : in fact from the D 268 concerning the International Rogatory in Rome, it emerged that Tiberti had been in Rome 5 times : on 11/9, 3/7, 14-15/10, 16/10 and on 13/11 reporting some "photocopies" which hadn’t been found in the certificates. Only the D269/D270 of 24 pages emerged according to judge Sereni’s proceeding. Something didn’t square, and as a consequence of falsehood, it was clear that everything had to be verified. In fact on 31 July 2002 it was asked to obtain the dossier about the penal proceeding  nr.29223/99 R.G. PM e 20668/99 R.G. GIP at the Procura di Roma against Testa and three other people. On 1 August 2002, 12 dossiers for over 1.300 pages were retracted !! Compared to the 24 pages, showed during the trial. It was the indisputable proof of the omissions and manipulation of truth, but not only: Tiberti’s forgery about the D.I.A.’s information in Rome, and judge Hullin’s forgery about my probable services given to Testa; without forgetting the letter which the Banca di Roma sent to the Credit Foncier of Monaco on 20 January 1999 (after personal call on 19/01/1999) which informed them about the suffered fraud (omitted in the given answer on 17/11/2000 by the C.F.M. to the Inspector A. Van De Corput); it was well known how the fraud had been planned against the Banca di Roma and who the responsable were . At this point there were no doubts and it was obvious that the trial’s purpose was to find a scapegoat who should have an excellent name used to hide precise responsibilities. What judge C. Duchaine wrote about the banks and bankers : "The untouchables" sounded very strange. In the hope that "Justice" could exist, the Appeal’s conclusion was going to be prepared, according to the obtained documentation and to the jurisprudence knowledge, the draft of indictment was starting. At the first 23 pages, other supplementary 8 ones and a further 77 memorial, were advanced, a total of 108 pages all supported by documentation ; the first instance provision had collapsed at some point showing the certain presence of the several planned mistakes, omissions and falsehood. It was reported to me that during a formal dinner, a French magistrate affirmed that about my case, jurisprudence would have been respected ! If such assertion would have been true, truth and justice would have been obtained. But everything was groundless because it belonged to Hullin and Tiberti’s plan.