My first impression of this person was of arrogance and snobbishness, and the fact that he didn’t look into one’s eyes except in a malevolent way. It was a strange sensation of suspiciousness, something slimy almost sneaking and ambiguous.

I didn’t feel the solemn charisma which is typical of judges, that sense of justice which is innate in their gestures, I couldn’t feel the emanation of the law person .

The doubts about his mental dishonesty had been confirmed through important facts which carried to certainty that justice had died and  “ JUSTICE DENIED” was brewing.

As a famous lawyer and ex “ batonnier” in Monaco said, the task of “ creating the guilty” was beginning .

In fact the behaviour during the first proceeding had stigmatized how he intentionally conducted the indictment thanks to judge Hullin and Tiberti’s forgeries. The certainty of bad faith and his awareness of telling lies , emerged from various actions I have already mentioned.

But his cruelty continued even during two proceedings, and more precisely in Castellino’s one , made in bad faith and in attempting fraud , and the  specially planned case of the office judicial liquidation.

He couldn’t accept that such further facts didn’t go as he hoped and that he couldn’t manipulate them as he would have wished . He could only, thanks to his abuse of power, delay the release of the bank accounts . In fact , even though judge Narmino gave his consent to judicial liquidator Garino to unfreeze the accounts after 28 October 2004, proceedings had been opposed  by judge Hullin until his moving in December to Paris, and by this magistrate until February 2005.

In fact the letter giving the “all clear” was intentionally stopped with a note (postick) until the fixed hearing with judge Narmino on 15 February 2005 to discuss the dossiers about A. Di Fani and L. Tarantelli and about the unfreezing of funds of E.P.S.I. Ltd of B. Reverberi ( this was the only account which hadn’t been frozen by Hullin’s proceeding , maybe forgotten or by mistake?).

When such delays emerged thanks to lawyer JM. Bertozzi , I was told that the fact had been promptly imputed but it was a misunderstanding on the secretary’s part .   

After having posted it, because of receiving an important phone call, the dossier remained blocked .

Fortunately he moved ! And from that point proceedings took another turn according to legality and justice.