- A
preface,
-
Reading his "Verbal Trials", –his deep ignorance- of the subject in
question, emerges, of the international rules about handling and fiscal
planning of companies, completely unknown to him ; he was only able to
transcribe news changing the facts according to the expected "power".
Regarding his investigations , there are four points to point out :
-
- The wanted and/or forced omission of the banking documentation, which
proved that other code accounts existed ;
-
- Serious mistakes during verification of the activity and documentation
in his possession ;
-
- His forgery of a D.I.A.’s dossier ;
-
- Falsification of my signature in a verbal trial as it emerged from
apocryphal examination.
-
Here follows the necessary documentation :
- 1) The
wanted and/or forced omission of banking documentation, which proved
that other code banking accounts existed.
-
After verification of several dossiers , the Cabinet documentation had
been thrown helter- skelter into a carton
,including
all contractual and handling documentation, after having read thousands
of letters and dossiers, it was found again the letter which had been
addressed to Mr. Lanza at the Banca del Gottardo was found again and
also the withdrawal receipts at the Compagnie Monegasque de Banque at
the Compagnie Monegasque de Gestion and at the Credit Foncier de Monaco
; everything in the hands of Casillo for an appropriate verification of
the funds according to that period bank’s dispositions.
-
- Why did Tiberti "want to omit" such documentation in his dossiers ?
-
- Why did Tiberti not make inquiries at the banks to probe Mangione’s
funds origin ? motu proprio or maybe because somebody ordered it?
-
- 2) The
glaring errors during verification of the activity and documentation in
his possession
-
Reading his “verbal trials", it’s an euphemism to affirm that it’s a
laughable situation ! Even though he had all written and informatics
documentation
,
he transcribed what he wished, manipulating the effective
documentation.
Here follow
some examples of his verbal trials :
-
D.5
Unable to understand the importance of the assistance given to a client
in the implication of what happened, in reproducing all S.c.i. MINNIE’s
background, through deep bad faith, he affirms that, according to an
international rogatory towards to A.G. A.M. for fraud and bankruptcy, I
was involved in this matter.
But, helped by lawyer.
Didier Escaut in Monaco, and lawyer Renato Alberti in San Remo I
prosecuted both figures, and I won both trials protecting my clients ;
As if this was not enough, he added a story which was worthy of the best
script in the style of -The God Father-. He didn’t ask for any copy of
the companies’ acts to verify who the partners were and the founders’
names at the Commerce Chambre and at the Notary’s Cabinet .
It’s obvious that such acts would have unmasked his falsehood.
It must be added that I enjoyed a good reputation as a businessman (?) I
was specialized in the Italian dossiers regarding tax and shady
financial businesses (?) ; maybe he didn’t have any idea about the
international fiscal planning , and nobody understood what these"
unclear financial business " were, as each transaction was
supported by juridical and account documentation –everything
declared-,and not least of all in his possession.
-
D.7
This verbal trial, is the apotheosis of ignorance, as regards the
handling of English company rights in partnership ; transcribing several
transactions between English companies, they were not able to explain
the reason of the transactions ; it was underlined that all files were
in his hands. It was a transposition and manipulation of truth of
the facts, which goes beyond imagination. Payments of invoices for
suppliers, salaries, insurances became sinister actions ! It was even
added that the handled companies had a fictitious social object.
Declaration that such affirmation is an euphemism, it’s more appropriate
to define it –a falsehood- ; English companies, which were the
fulcrum of their inquiry, were known internationally as regards sport
(handling of professional cyclist groups) , in the fashion and show
world with international actresses and models etc. This was a further
wedge in the construction of falsehood he was planning.
-
D.8
In this verbal trial, bad faith and ignorance emerged ; in fact during
interrogation to the director of the Banca del Gottardo, the movements
of deposits between the two companies , which were handled in
partnership, was not clear. It would be sufficient to read some books
which concerned English fiscal rules. It was his continuous bad faith in
creating doubts about transactions according to laws as regards "Limited
Partnership Act 1907". It must be underlined that the Inspector’s
ignorance was at the same level as the director’s, it was maybe a role
play ? Or it was to obtain a perfect verbal trial by the manipulation of
the truth.
- 3) Forgery
about transcription of a D.I.A.’s dossier
-
The manipulation of truth was normal for him, it was natural for him to
transform doubts and falsehood ; the Verbal Trial D99 was a further
proof, the D.I.A.’s answer built according his will, indicating Renato
Mangione as known inopportune person who had legal precedents since 1993
for breaches of weapons law . When faced with the D.I.A.’s answer, the
reaction is to be shocked by his presumption to do falsehood in the
absolute certainty of not being punished ( and so it happened) ; in fact
he was not known by this public corporation, and furthermore the weapons
law breach was a simple formal neglect which was not attributable to
Mangione.
It
was a shaking of the truth documentation.
Reading the dossiers it clearly emerges what he planned to fortify his
castle of lies ; furthermore there were no doubts about his perfect
knowledge of Italian language, it’s sufficient to see his director’s
declaration.
-
4) My
signature’s falsification on a verbal trial according to apocryphal
expertise.
-
As if this is not enough, to straighten out his declarations, he
transcribed a verbal trial, falsifying my signature ! On the verbal
trial D 44 on page n. 2, my signatures had been verified by Dr. Carla
Bergamaschi , and in fact it emerged that they were false, it’s
sufficient to see the expert's report.
